Novel Investor

Compounding investing wisdom...

What I Learned from the Most Popular Posts of 2018

by

With a couple weeks left to the year, it’s time for a review.

Like last year, I spent most of 2018 sharing what I found in books, articles, interviews, etc. And like every year, I still have no clue why some posts get traction over others.

Big names certainly help, as you’ll likely notice below. But beyond that, the sort of randomness to it remains a mystery to me. Regardless of why, when it does happen, it’s always a nice surprise and I appreciate it!

The broad lesson from this year, much like every year, is this: The studying of strategies, factors, and allocations is pointless if you don’t have the prerequisite behavior to go with it. Compounding misbehavior, mistakes, and poor decisions are the easiest way to go broke. Doing the opposite (more often than not), finding a strategy you can stick with, one that fits your quirks (along with a regular saving schedule), is how to grow wealth.

The secret is there are no secrets. The lessons in the posts below span over 130 years. None of it is new or groundbreaking. It’s all grounded in common sense. Someone just said it differently enough to strike a chord.

Here are the most read posts of 2018: Continue Reading…

Seth Klarman: The Hardest Decision of All

by

Seth Klarman describes selling as “the hardest decision of all.” That would make buying the second hardest decision.

The art of buying means first realizing that price fluctuations are a feature of markets that also tend to trigger emotions like fear and greed. If an investment is really worth buying, day to day price moves shouldn’t matter.

But once something is bought, those emotional triggers still exist, only now your money is at stake, along with a new issue of knowing precisely when to sell. Here’s Klarman: Continue Reading…

Marty Whitman: The Art of Good Enough Investing

by

The idea of good enough flies in the face of the belief we have absolute control over our investment results. We don’t have control but want to believe we do because the alternative — being out of our hands — can be unsettling.

That feeling leads people to obsess over the minutiae in the market and economy, in order to predict the future, so they can perfectly time the market turns, and maximize returns.

In reality, investing is messy. Perfection is a lofty goal doomed to failure because mistakes and being wrong are part of the process. So is dumb luck. And bad luck.

Good enough investing accepts the messiness up front. Smart investing strategies are built around it, by accepting the role probability plays and, given time, swings success in their favor. The best outcome isn’t necessarily the best return, but a favorable return.

Marty Whitman explained his version of good enough investing in a 1996 shareholder letter. He boiled it down to knowing the limits of his skill and being less active. Once his “safe and cheap” criteria were met, it came down to good enough. Continue Reading…

The Short-Term Trap

by

A Seth Klarman speech, titled Hard Decisions, about the constant pressure toward a short-term view and the expansive pitfalls it creates. It’s worth reading.

Consider corporate time horizons. It’s a choice to attempt to maximize corporate results over the very short run and a different and sometimes harder decision to take a longer-term view. I’m convinced that one of society’s most vexing problems is the relentlessly short-term orientation that manifests itself in investing, in business decision-making, and in our politics. Educational and philanthropic endowments, for example, with institutional time horizons that necessarily span centuries, invest their funds with monthly performance comparisons. Jeremy Grantham, cofounder of the global investment firm GMO, recently observed in the context of governmental inaction on climate change, “We face a form of capitalism that has hardened its focus to short-term profit maximization with little or no apparent interest in social good.”
Continue Reading…

Seth Klarman: Opportunities from the Herd

by

Studying investor behavior is a two-part process. The first, limiting the influence of biases and misbehavior improves your returns. The second step is to seize opportunities created by those who refuse to learn the same lessons you did.

The opportunities created by the short-term nature of the herd are why most strategies work. The heart of value investing revolves around this idea. Value exists because investors mistakenly discount current prices for an indefinitely bleak future.

But first, that means not getting swept up in the herd behavior you’re attempting to profit from. Optimism and pessimism, greed and fear, risk tolerance and risk-aversion are easier to latch onto when others do the same. Safety in numbers feels comforting until you find out, a little too late, that the numbers were acting irrationally.

Seth Klarman likes to point to the importance of discipline and patience in investing. Conveniently, discipline and patience are literally a contrarian stance as far as herd behavior is concerned. The independence it creates — to have a process you stick to no matter what — becomes the backbone to successful investing. Continue Reading…

Marty Whitman on Why Value Exists in Bull Markets

by

I was browsing some of Marty Whitman’s old Third Avenue shareholder letters I had dug up a few years back. The nice thing about these old letters is the ability to go back to see someone’s thought process around bigger market events.

An excerpt (below) from one of those letters stood out for two reasons. First, Whitman wrote it in July 2000, a few months after the peak of the Dotcom Bubble, though nobody knew it was the peak at the time. The opening paragraph shows the juxtaposition of Dotcom enthusiasm versus the ignored value stocks Whitman was buying.

Those ignored stocks were trading at 10x earnings, while the market was going nuts over Nasdaq stocks at 141 times earnings. Even the P/Es of the Nasdaq versus the S&P 500 was hugely distorted.

The idea of paying $141 for $1 of earnings seems insane today, but that was typical back then. I remember friends asking about getting into eToys.com after the IPO. It practically tripled the first day, closing with a market cap 35% higher than Toys R Us despite only having $34 million in revenue and zero profits (Toys R Us had $11 billion in revenue at the time). Continue Reading…

Return Tables

Recent Posts

Connect