The idea of good enough flies in the face of the belief we have absolute control over our investment results. We don’t have control but want to believe we do because the alternative — being out of our hands — can be unsettling.
That feeling leads people to obsess over the minutiae in the market and economy, in order to predict the future, so they can perfectly time the market turns, and maximize returns.
In reality, investing is messy. Perfection is a lofty goal doomed to failure because mistakes and being wrong are part of the process. So is dumb luck. And bad luck.
Good enough investing accepts the messiness up front. Smart investing strategies are built around it, by accepting the role probability plays and, given time, swings success in their favor. The best outcome isn’t necessarily the best return, but a favorable return.
Marty Whitman explained his version of good enough investing in a 1996 shareholder letter. He boiled it down to knowing the limits of his skill and being less active. Once his “safe and cheap” criteria were met, it came down to good enough. Continue Reading…
