Novel Investor

Compounding investing wisdom...

  • Home
  • About
  • Library
  • Quotes
  • Resources

Warren Buffett on Adam Smith’s Money World

June 2, 2021 by Jon

Warren Buffett made an appearance on Adam Smith’s Money World in 1985. Adam Smith is the author of The Money Game and Supermoney. He’s also George Goodman’s pen name.

Buffett has shared his investment wisdom for decades. He’s been repeating some version of it since he learned it from Ben Graham.

Timeless concepts like capital preservation, temperament over IQ, buying good value, circle of competence, and how stocks are a portion of a business not a piece of paper are covered.

If you’ve heard Buffett’s mantra before, this won’t be new to you but the reminder is worth it. Take the time to read the transcript below.

 ***

George Goodman [narrator]: Others with a more secular approach who have also been very successful. Let’s take Warren Buffett of Omaha, Nebraska. If you would put $10,000 in 1965 into his company Berkshire Hathaway, you would have one million today. Warren was a chapter in my 1972 book Supermoney, so I’ve known him a long time. He learned his trade with Ben Graham the original dean of security analysis at Columbia University.

I don’t think Warren has ever been on television until this interview, and he is certainly never courted publicity, but recently he got a lot of it when he emerged as the key figure in the takeover of ABC by Capital Cities. Warren will be the largest shareholder of the new company and his own net worth is now far in excess of $500 million.

But when I spoke with him last fall in his office in Omaha, he very characteristically made his investment style seem so perfectly simple.

Warren Buffett: The first rule of an investment is: Don’t lose. And the second rule of investment is: Don’t forget the first rule. And that’s all the rules there are.

I mean, if you buy things for far below what they’re worth, and you buy a group of them, you basically don’t lose money.

Goodman: Warren, what do you consider the most important quality for an investment manager?

Buffett: It’s the temperamental quality, not an intellectual quality. You don’t need tons of IQ in this business. I mean, you have to have enough IQ to get from here to downtown Omaha, but you do not have to be able to play three-dimensional chess or be in the top leagues in terms of bridge playing or something of the sort. You need a stable personality. You need a temperament that neither derives great pleasure from being with the crowd or against the crowd because this is not a business where you take polls, it’s a business where you think.

And Ben Graham would say that you’re not right or wrong because a thousand people agree with you. And you’re not right or wrong because a thousand people disagree with you. You’re right because your facts and your reasoning are right.

Goodman: Warren, what do you do that’s different than ninety percent of the money managers who are in the market?

Buffett: Certainly most of the professional investors focus on what the stock is likely to do in the next year or two and they have all kinds of arcane methods of approaching that.

They do not really think of themselves as owning a piece of a business. The real test of whether you’re investing from a value standpoint or not, is whether you care whether the stock market is open tomorrow. If you’re making a good investment in a security, it shouldn’t bother if they closed down the stock market for five years.

All the ticker tells me is the price. And I can look at the price occasionally to see whether the price is outlandishly cheap or outlandishly high but prices don’t tell me anything about a business.

Business figures themselves tell me something about a business but the price of a stock doesn’t tell me anything about a business. I would rather value a stock or a business first, and not even know the price, so that I’m not influenced by the price in establishing my valuation and then look at the price later to see whether it’s way out of line with what my value is.

Goodman [narrator]: So Buffett chose to stay in this world, Omaha, Nebraska, where corn grows just minutes from downtown. Now, Omaha is a nice town but nobody claimed it’s the world financial center. Here, the only thundering herd is actually on four feet.

Don’t you find Omaha a little bit off the beaten track for the investment world?

Buffett: Well, believe it or not, we get mail here and we get periodicals and we get all the facts needed to make decisions.

And, unlike Wall Street, you’ll notice we don’t have fifty people coming up and whispering in our ear that we should be doing this or that this afternoon.

Goodman: You appreciate the lack of stimulus here?

Buffett: I like the lack of stimulation. We get facts, not stimulation here.

Goodman: How can you stay away from Wall Street?

Buffett: Well, if I were on Wall Street, I’d probably be a lot poorer. You get overstimulated on Wall Street. And you hear lots of things. And you may shorten your focus and a short focus is not conducive to long profits.

And here I can just focus on what businesses are worth. And I don’t need to be in Washington to figure out what the Washington Post newspaper is worth. And I don’t need to be in New York to figure out what some other company is worth. It’s simple… It’s an intellectual process and the less static there is in an intellectual process, really, the better off you are.

Goodman: What is the intellectual process?

Buffett: The intellectual process is defining your level…defining your area of competence in valuing businesses. And then, within that area of competence, finding whatever sells at the cheapest price in relation to value.

And there are all kinds of things I’m not competent to value. There are a few that I am confident to value.

Goodman: Have you ever bought a technology company?

Buffett: No, I really haven’t.

Goodman: In thirty years of investing, not one?

Buffett: I haven’t understood any of em.

Goodman: So you haven’t ever owned, for example, IBM?

Buffett: Never owned IBM. Marvelous company. I mean, a sensational company. But I haven’t owned IBM.

Goodman: And so, here is this technological revolution going on and you’re not gonna be a participant.

Buffett: Gone right past me.

Goodman: Is that alright with you?

Buffett: It’s okay with me. I don’t have to make money in every game. I mean, I don’t know what cocoa beans are gonna do. There are all kinds of things I don’t know about, and that may be too bad, but you know, why should I know all about it — haven’t worked that hard on it.

In securities business, you literally every day have thousands of the major American corporations offered you at a price that changes daily and you don’t have to make any decision. Nothing is forced upon you.

There are no called strikes in the business. The pitcher just stands there and throws balls at you. And if you’re playing real baseball, and it’s between the knees and the shoulders, you either swing or you got a strike called on you. If you get too many called on you, you’re out.

In the securities business, you sit there and they throw U.S. Steel at 25 and they throw General Motors at 16. You don’t have to swing at any of them. They may be wonderful pitches to swing at but if you don’t know enough, you don’t have to swing. And you can sit there and watch thousands of pitches and finally get one right there where you wanted something that you understand and then you swing.

Goodman: So you might not swing for six months?

Buffett: Might not swing for two years.

Goodman: Isn’t that boring?

Buffett: It will bore most people and certainly boredom is a problem with most professional money managers. If they sit out an inning or two, not only do they get somewhat antsy, but their clients start yelling, “Swing you bum,” from the stands. And that’s very tough for people to do.

Goodman: Warren, your approach seems so simple, why doesn’t everybody do it?

Buffett: Well I think partly because it is so simple. The academics, for example, focus on all kinds of variables partly because…

Goodman: By academics, you mean professors in finance in business school?

Buffett: Right. The data is there. So they focus on whether if you buy stocks on Tuesday and sell them on Friday, you’re better off. Or if you buy em in an election year and sell em in other years, you’re better off. Or if you buy small companies. There are all these variables because the data are there. And they learn how to manipulate data.

And as a friend of mine says, to a man with a hammer everything looks like a nail. And once you have these skills, you just are dying to utilize them in some way. But they aren’t important.

If I were being asked to participate in a business opportunity, would it make any difference to me whether I bought it on a Tuesday or a Saturday or an election year or something? It’s not what a businessman thinks about in buying businesses. So why think about it when buying stocks? Because stocks are just pieces of businesses.

Note: A PDF of the transcript is available in the Library.

This post was originally published on August 8, 2018.

Related Reading:
Buffett: Why Smart People Do Dumb Things
Warren Buffett: The Best Reason for Selling

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Sign up for more weekly wisdom.

Want to compound your investing wisdom?

Find Out More

Learning

  • Library
  • Book Notes
  • Quotes

Return Tables

  • Asset Class Returns
  • Stock Sector Returns
  • International Stock Market Returns
  • Emerging Markets Returns
  • Historical Returns

Connect

Search

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact

© 2023 Novel Investor · All Rights Reserved · Terms of Use · Privacy Policy · Disclaimer