Rich Cohen tells the story of a Russian immigrant, Sam Zemurray, who saw an opportunity in the banana business and seized it. Along the way, he out-hustled and out-innovated the giant of the industry, United Fruit.
·
Rich Cohen tells the story of a Russian immigrant, Sam Zemurray, who saw an opportunity in the banana business and seized it. Along the way, he out-hustled and out-innovated the giant of the industry, United Fruit.
·
A moat is a competitive advantage one company has over the competition. It can’t be easily copied either. Otherwise, it wouldn’t be a moat, it’d be a temporary edge.
The moat comes in several forms — economies of scale, network effects, intellectual property, switching costs, and cost advantage — that produce phenomenal performance over extended periods. Buffett’s focus on moats created a craze around finding these “wonderful companies.”
But before you run off to do the same, consider this. Buffett is unique in that he has his own moat. All great investors do. They have a competitive advantage over everyone else that produces phenomenal performance over extended periods. Without their moat, they’d be like everyone else.
You might think their moat is IQ, the right college degree, or experience. It’s not. Those things are important because they keep you in the game but all those things can be copied to some degree. It’s a temporary edge until a similarly smart, experienced person comes along. Besides, up to a certain point, an extra IQ point or one more experience brings less to the table. Continue Reading…
·
Joel Greenblatt is one of the rare few who can claim 40% returns over two decades. He also has a knack for explaining things simply.
He did that in his first book, You Can Be a Stock Market Genius, which explained how he earned some of that 40% return. And it showed again in his second book, The Little Book that Beats the Market.
And he did it again in his third book, The Big Secret for the Small Investor, though it’s a little different than the first two. It’s written for people new to the game, but there’s something in it for everyone.
His message is simple: the small investor has built-in advantages over the pros and there is more than one right way to invest. You can try to value stocks, evaluate fund managers, or settle for index funds. And if the typical index fund is too average for you, maybe spice things up with equal- or value-weighted funds instead. Continue Reading…
·
Finishing How to Take a Chance (notes) led me to chase down the source of a few quotes from the book. The last post was a result of that distraction. Today’s post is another — and the last of that odyssey.
In 1902, a guy named Clemens J. France wrote a study called The Gambling Impulse. It’s interesting only in the sense that he took a biological and historical perspective of gambling and chance.
The summarized version is this. Gambling has been around forever, literally since the first utterance of “Wanna bet?” It can be traced back several thousand years — Ancient Egypt, Greece, Rome, and to 2100 B.C. China. Biologically, its a battle of hope and fear, to provide a level of certainty in life. If you plan to glance through the 44 pages, the section on luck, with examples of superstitious beliefs, offered a good laugh. This seemed relevant:
In London about Throgmorton Street (the paradise of stock brokers), there used to sit a man with a bag of nuts into which passers by thrust a hand, and if they guessed correctly the number, they would be paid a penny for each, if wrong, the guesser paid a penny. Many a speculator regulated his ‘bulling’ and ‘bearing’ by his successful or unsuccessful dip into the bag.”
To think that a trader’s (in)ability to guess the number of nuts determined their feeling explains a lot about irrational markets. Continue Reading…
·
Ed Thorp has a skeptical mind. That’s what got him to question the belief that you couldn’t beat the casino. That same skepticism eventually drove him to question financial markets. During an interview, Thorp explained that journey and what he learned.
The big difference between gambling and investing is in the probabilities. Most gambling games have fixed probabilities. Precise accuracy is possible.
In the game of blackjack, if you know the number of decks, then you know how many of each card exists (assuming the House plays fair), and you can work out the odds from there.
Not so with investing. The complexity of markets, the number of factors involved, make precision impossible. Here’s Thorp: Continue Reading…
·
What does horse racing have to do with investing? Everything. The key is to think of “horses” as “stocks.”
Most gambling, like blackjack, roulette, or craps, involves betting against the House. Not so at the horse track. Instead, you bet against other bettors and your, and everyone else’s, bets on different horses (stocks) change the odds.
Not surprising, how people approach betting on horses is fairly similar to how people bet on stocks.
Steven Crist says as much in a chapter he wrote for Bet with the Best, as he explains how to bet on horses. But as I said at the top, swap out “horse” with “stock” and you’ll see the similarities with investing: Continue Reading…